Freezing of social rents also threatens construction of approximately 5,500 mid- and private-sector rental homes in 2025

News 23 Apr 2025

The much-discussed rent freeze announced in the Spring Memorandum is not only bad news for the construction of new social housing, but also affects the development of mid-rental and private sector housing. An analysis by Capital Value shows that, in 2025 alone, the construction of approximately 5,500 mid- and private-sector rental homes is also at risk due to the announced measure. This is because many social housing units are built as part of mixed projects. If the housing corporation, which would normally purchase the social housing units, drops out, it could mean that the entire project cannot proceed, resulting in a decrease in the number of newly built homes. This must be prevented, especially now, as the number of building permits issued in the first two months of 2025 has already dropped by 26% compared to the same period last year. The target of building 100,000 homes per year is therefore moving even further out of reach. The construction of new rental homes now requires stimulating measures rather than the inhibiting effects of a rent freeze.

Social housing in 37% of new rental projects key to construction start
An analysis of residential investment transactions in 2024 shows that at least 37% of all newly built rental homes are part of a mixed project consisting of social, mid-market, and private sector rental units. The construction of rental homes in all three segments is therefore threatened by the rent freeze on social housing, as these projects often cannot be realized without a buyer for the social housing units. This casts new light on the rent freeze for social housing that is part of the plans outlined in the Spring Memorandum. Sector organization Aedes already indicated in response to the plans that approximately half of the new construction projects planned by housing associations would not be able to proceed if rents are frozen in 2025 and 2026. Based on the building permits granted for rental homes in 2024 — projects that would need to start construction in 2025 — more than 6,500 corporation-owned homes are at risk. However, based on Capital Value’s analysis, it can now also be stated that the construction of another approximately 5,500 mid-market and private sector rental homes is at risk, because these homes are part of projects where the corporation’s role as the buyer of the social rental units is crucial to starting construction. The risks will be even greater in the years after 2025, as many projects for the coming years have not yet obtained their permits. As a result, the housing shortage could worsen significantly, potentially reaching 453,000 by 2027.

Number of building permits in first two months 26% lower than in 2024
The announcement of a potential rent freeze comes at an unfortunate time. Not only will this measure deteriorate the investment climate for the entire new rental housing market, but the number of building permits issued in the first two months of 2025 is also 26% lower than in 2024. In January and February of this year, only 6,538 permits were issued. If this pace continues for the rest of the year, only around 50,000 building permits will be issued in 2025. To achieve the government’s target of 100,000 new homes per year, new construction now urgently needs stimulating measures rather than rent-restricting policies that further pressure the development of affordable rental housing.

Arjan Peerboom, CEO of Capital Value, says: “The freezing of rent prices for social housing affects not only the social rental sector but also the other rental segments. In mixed projects with both social and mid- and private-sector rental units, housing associations are often essential to get the project off the ground. The investment capacity of housing associations is therefore of critical importance for the entire rental sector. A rent freeze across all rental segments, which is also being discussed in the House of Representatives, would have disastrous consequences for the construction of rental housing. In addition, the measure negatively impacts both Dutch and international investors’ trust in the government. A favorable investment climate, for which stable government policy is crucial, is necessary to attract the capital needed for the major construction challenges that the Netherlands will face in the coming years.”